Le port du masque obligatoire : ce n’est pas pour une raison de santé publique
– Parce que ce n’est pas nécessaire…
– Parce que la science n’appuie pas leur efficacité…
– Parce que la courbe est aplatie…
– Parce qu’on n’éliminera pas le virus…
– Parce qu’il n’y a eu que 500 morts en dehors des CHSLD et des résidences pour personnes âgées au Québec, et ce, sans masque dans les 4 derniers mois…
– Parce que la peur nous rend obéissants…
– Parce qu’un mensonge répété mille fois semble devenir une vérité…
#noussommesdesmoutons
Voici deux images qui parlent par elles-mêmes :
1- 2 états aux États-Unis : l’un oblige le masque (Arkansas) et l’autre non (Oklahoma)
2- 2 pays dans le monde : l’un oblige le masque (Royaume-Uni) et l’autre non (Suède)
Références :
– Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
« N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds ».
– Cowling, B. et al. (2010) : https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
« None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). »
– bin-Reza et al. (2012) : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x?fbclid=IwAR1Q4oI0OyfvkVI46Uct8qPDa4HjALH4SusQM-fr_34_ITU79sE2O9S-cII
« There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection. »
– Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) : https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
“We identified 6 clinical studies … In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
– Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) : https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant”
– Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) : https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
– Long, Y. et al. (2020) : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
“A total of six RCTs involving 9 171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
– Article de La Presse (mars 2020)
https://www.lapresse.ca/covid-19/2020-03-18/quebec-demande-aux-citoyens-de-ne-pas-porter-de-masque?fbclid=IwAR3wEHMTtmW365enaas9DJ4cY72cf62fWRyH2_VsizwW9_qa2Xp4xzvJce4
« Le masque n’est pas un moyen de protection des infections dans la communauté…. Dans les faits, si vous voulez vous protéger, ce n’est pas le masque qui est important. Lavez-vous donc les mains ». Dr. Horacio Arruda
– Courbe de cas au Canada : https://sante-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/resume-epidemiologique-cas-covid-19.html?fbclid=IwAR2IWAF27c0BdPro1urwVU9A8g7Je42geUdAfd13unMNDpNauhLL_sRu3is